This book was interesting in 2 ways; the way it was written and of course the content of the story.
Now this book has no chapters, and no page numbers, so you truly lose yourself in the diary of this tormented man who has lost what he believes to be everything; his wife.
Then the book is interesting as the story takes us down a road of moral dilemmas and blame:how far back do we take blame, in this case the politician put through a policy that led to a terrorist attack and the death of his wife. Equally if they hadn't argued she may still be alive. So who does the blame come down to? It's an interesting idea as we often just lob blame around like candy rather than actually considering how much belongs to who.
However I feel the ending could have had more weight given to it as I found it to be a bit lacklustre.
Now this book has no chapters, and no page numbers, so you truly lose yourself in the diary of this tormented man who has lost what he believes to be everything; his wife.
Then the book is interesting as the story takes us down a road of moral dilemmas and blame:how far back do we take blame, in this case the politician put through a policy that led to a terrorist attack and the death of his wife. Equally if they hadn't argued she may still be alive. So who does the blame come down to? It's an interesting idea as we often just lob blame around like candy rather than actually considering how much belongs to who.
However I feel the ending could have had more weight given to it as I found it to be a bit lacklustre.